Tag Archives: Receiver

DISTRESS CAN COME FROM THE MOST UNLIKELY PLACES

When “Free Enterprise” gets it wrong, things can go pear-shaped quite rapidly.  Take the Brisbane Central Business District as a prime example – and if this goes as badly as I think it will, the effects will flow to surrounding areas like a cancer.

Buyers are gullible.  Who believes everything the salesperson and/or Developer tells them in their glossy brochures?    Well, the vast majority it seems.  People want a nice new shiny Apartment with a rental guarantee and massive capital gain to fund their retirement, buy a big boat and so on.  The promoters will say and write anything, as long as it comes with a Disclaimer as long as a telephone book (and about as interesting).

People do NOT do their own research.  Are they just lazy, or have so much money they can afford to lose $100,000.00 like dropping a $5 note on the ground?  Or is it that they really do not want to find out that they can buy far better value for sometimes 100’s of thousands less a few blocks away where it’s all established and happy?  Who knows?

The fallout from over 30 thousand Units/Apartments hitting a saturated Brisbane CBD market over the next 24 to 36 months will be catastrophic. This same thing happened here on the Gold Coast and was well publicised in the lead up, during and afterwards when folks lost their “investment” and their principal place of residence to the Banks as it was tied up as “security” for their supposedly bulletproof investment!

Prices of Apartments are falling – and fast – I would not be surprised to see discounting at the 15 to 20 percent range in the next 6 months.  Rents are falling much faster.  Apartments are sitting vacant for a couple of months, so cash poor landlords (many of whom have never had an investment property before) are going nuts at their letting Agent and saying “get me a tenant…at any price, as I am bleeding cash here!”

Well – there is your next problem.  Crap tenants.  Agents not only have to deal with a very large number of new Apartments to try and find tenants for, their time to check references is reduced so some very bad tenants will move in to new buildings and cause chaos.  Good tenants in the same building will cry foul and move out to get away from the drunken party animals, leaving even more apartments vacant and the cycle then spirals downwards.  There are many buildings here on the Gold Coast where the ratio of sole operator prostitutes to tenants in the same building is quite staggering!  Not to forget the Mobile Drug Labs!

As rents crash and buildings become full of rat-bag tenants, first-time landlords will “want out” so even more Apartments will come on to the market, adding to the glut.  These “distressed sales” will put more pressure on Developers, already staring at floors and floors of dead stock. Prices will “tank”.

When prices “tank” in one area, especially when you talk about tens of thousands of properties, the contagion rapidly spreads to surrounding areas as confidence falls.

I know I’ve been banging on about this rapid correction for a while now, but we are seeing the many and varied conditions required for a perfect storm, slowly but surely coming together.

Watch this space for when interest rates cycle upwards!

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

PRESSURE FROM ALL SIDES

Hi.  As we approach Christmas there are slightly alarming FACTS emerging around the country that point to a hefty correction around the corner for our teetering real estate market.

I guess the first one should be the USA’s impending decision to start to raise interest rates as they see their economy “recovering” somewhat.  The rest is happening here Down Under.  If we have a 2 percent rise in interest rates here, 40 percent of home owners will no longer be able to pay their mortgages – period – FACT.  That many properties flooding the market will start an avalanche of sales that I won’t be joining in to buy any time soon.  Not until the  streets are running a metre deep in Mortgage Blood would I get back into property.

Aussie Banks have tightened their lending criteria.  So many (foolish) people buy OFF THE PLAN – Why?  They stake their place with a ten percent deposit.  Come near settlement time, the Bank , after re-valuing most of these places says “Sorry – we need 20% deposit or NO LOAN for the rest”.  With most of these properties selling for OVER $700,000.00 who has a lazy $70,000 lying around?  Almost none of them so 1.  The seller sues and buyer loses deposit and equity in other properties etc or 2.  Buyer just walks away and leaves $70,000 behind and fingers crossed the Developer does not sue them for failing to complete.  Has this happened?  Yes – many, many times, especially here on the (fake tan – false Gods) Gold Coast.

When the Fire Sales start, whole suburbs will be revalued and lenders will eventually be forced to re-evaluate their portfolios and admit that most of their loans are under water.  Who of these battlers can come up with extra money if demanded by the Bank – ahhh – about NONE – unless Mum and Dad come to the rescue and put the family home up for security – in a falling market, this is a really DUMB IDEA!  But they will do it and the Banks will accept it – until the market corrects some more, and they ask for more equity and so on…until both properties are at risk of default.  Combine this scenario with the aforementioned rate rise “elephant in the room” and once again you can see why I am nowhere near real estate right now.

Things are getting tighter and tighter too – just look at the continued growth in credit card debt – bad enough at 18 to 22 percent per annum, but what about Pay Day lenders, who are raking it in – double the number of loans in the last year or so (average size about $500.00 I believe), with punters paying interest of over 100% per annum annualised!  If that does not point to a lot of people “losing the plot” financially, I don;t know what does.

Combine that Genius Financial IQ with previously mentioned factors and we have a recipe for disaster.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EVEN GIANT BOND MANAGER PIMCO HAS A VIEW LIKE MINE NOW

Please take a look at this article –  http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/pimco-calls-on-banks-to-do-their-bit-and-raise-capital-20150428-1mv1ly.html

I rest my case – AGAIN!

If you’re a property owner – get out NOW, put your money away, rent and wait til the bubble burst-eth!

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MAYBE IF I KEEP TALKING

Maybe if I keep talking about a major imbalance in the market that is, and has been for a long time, overdue for a correction to reality, people will start to listen.  I’m OUT of residential real estate, and have been for a few years now.  The downside risk is just too high.

And today, Thursday 26 March 2015, the Reserve Bank has issued a warning that cheap credit has and will continue to fuel a housing bubble.  Hello!!!

Just Google  RBA cheap credit housing bubble.  There are many links to the various articles in today’s news.

Once again, I rest my case.

 

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

YET ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE THAT ITS ALL GOING PEAR-SHAPED

Housing leverage hits a record high  an article by Article by RP Data senior research analyst,
Cameron Kusher

 

Based on data from the Reserve Bank, the ratio of household debt to disposable income and housing debt to disposable income has increased over the June 2014 quarter with housing debt now at a record high level.

Each quarter, after the Australian Bureau of Statistics releases its data on financial accounts, the Reserve Bank (RBA) releases their ‘Household finances – selected ratios’ data sheet. The information provides a timely overview about the level of household leverage.

The latest data for June 2014 has just been released and it showed that at the end of the June quarter, total household debt to disposable income had increased to 151.1%. The figure had increased from 150.2% the previous quarter and 147.7% a year earlier. The ratio is now at it’s highest level since March 2008. As the first chart shows the ratio has been relatively flat over recent years but is now starting to rise once more.

 

Based on data from the Reserve Bank, the ratio of household debt to disposable income and housing debt to disposable income has increased over the June 2014 quarter with housing debt now at a record high level.

Each quarter, after the Australian Bureau of Statistics releases its data on financial accounts, the Reserve Bank (RBA) releases their ‘Household finances – selected ratios’ data sheet. The information provides a timely overview about the level of household leverage.

The latest data for June 2014 has just been released and it showed that at the end of the June quarter, total household debt to disposable income had increased to 151.1%. The figure had increased from 150.2% the previous quarter and 147.7% a year earlier. The ratio is now at it’s highest level since March 2008. As the first chart shows the ratio has been relatively flat over recent years but is now starting to rise once more.

 

When you look at the key driver of the increase in the ratio, it is no real surprise that leverage in the housing market is the major driver. As at June 2014, 137.1% of the 151.1% total household debt figure or a record high 90.7% was housing debt. In fact the 137.1% ratio of housing debt to disposable income is a record high and up from 136.1% the previous quarter and 133.3% a year earlier. As was the case with household debt, you can see that housing debt was relatively unchanged for a number of years but has recently started to rise once again.

 

The RBA breaks this data out further to owner occupiers and investors. Of that 137.1%, 90.9% (or 66.3% of the 137.1%) was to owner occupiers with the remaining 46.2% (or 33.7% of the 137.1%) to investors. The proportion of overall housing debt to owner occupiers is trending lower at the moment while investor debt rises.

The data also includes information on the value of assets to disposable income. According to the statistics, the ratio of total household assets to disposable incomes is 801.9%. This figure is now at its highest level since March 2008. This 801.9% is split into housing assets which account for 433.6% and financial assets which make up the remaining 342.2%. The housing assets figure is at its highest level since June 2008 while the financial assets figure is lower over the quarter, down from 342.9% in March.

 

The chart highlights the trends over time. What they indicate is that households have consistently stored a majority of their wealth in housing assets as opposed to financial assets. Unfortunately the data is not available prior to 1988 so we don’t have visibility on the results prior to that time.

Chart 4 looks at the annual change in the ratio of housing debt to disposable income plotted against the annual change in combined capital city home values. Although the ratio of housing debt to disposable income is rising it is doing so at a much more moderate pace than it has in the past despite quite strong growth in home values. It is difficult to know exactly why this is happening however, the RBA has reported in its latest Financial Stability Review that the typical mortgagee has more than 2 years’ worth of mortgage repayments sitting in mortgage offset or redraw facilities. This may go some way to explaining the moderate rise. Alternatively, a rise in foreign buyers could also be a contributing factor. Other potential reasons include lower loan to value ratios or investors purchasing using significant equity in their principal place of residence.

 

The data highlights that household and housing debt is increasing and with home values continuing to rise we would anticipate a further rise in both measures over the coming quarter. The RBA has previously stated that further increases in household debt are not ideal. With housing debt at a record high level and investor activity at near record highs, I don’t think it is any surprise that the RBA is looking to macroprudential tools to take some of the heat out of the housing market.

 

You don’t need the charts – the words tell it all.  Be very careful folks…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

IS EVERYONE WRONG?

take a look here – http://www.imf.org/external/research/housing/index.htm and here -> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-12/janda-its-official-property-prices-are-getting-out-of-reach/5517674

When things are this HOT for this LONG, something is bound to give..

If interest rates take a spike here, watch the fallout.

DO NOT BUY PROPERTY AT THE MOMENT.

IF YOU HAVE SOME AND ARE NOT AFRAID OF TAKING A 30-40% HIT, THEN SIT TIGHT….OTHERWISE, SELL UP AND RENT FOR 2 YEARS THEN BUY YOUR OLD PLACE BACK AT A BARGAIN PRICE…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PERFECT STORM BREWING – 03 APRIL 2014

It’s all adding up….well, for me anyway, so let’s see how this pans out.

Retail stores are closing at an alarming rate in the USA and Europe, and yes, here in Australia.  My local large shopping centre has just had 5% of tenancies “walk” at the end of their leases, with strong suggestions from people I know who are “in business” but only just, in the same centre, that up to 10% of the tenancies could walk in coming months.  Unlike 2005 for instance, there aren’t 40 people waiting in the wings to get into this centre.  There is no-one.  No registers of interest, no active list, reserve list or any kind of list.

Large shopping centres are dinosaurs and some people just won’t admit it.  Ridiculous rents forcing retailers to charge equally ridiculous prices and therefore having no chance against online retailers with cheap-as-chips warehouse rent in the middle-of-nowhere.

There are otherwise intelligent people (I think) spending nearly AUD$700 million on rebuilding and revitalising another massive local shopping/destination centre.  The reasons they cite to try and justify their decision are plain ridiculous – the place will be an albino pachydermata.

If shopping centre owners drop their rents to a level where traditional retailers can once again run a half decent business, capital values will plummet.  Flow on to smaller commercial and industrial properties is sure. Lack of return, loss of jobs and its not hard to see residential housing taking a dive as well.  Don’t think so?

Massive interest rate cuts have failed to stem the drop in residential values.  The butchering of statistics continues.  I was recently challenged as to why my view differed from the those reported in the news and delivered startling “real results” to back up my view.  Yet again a number of properties in a suburb were quoted as delivering massive price rises that contributed to the percentage rises being quoted in the news.  Shallow analysis of each of these properties showed that there were, in each and every case, factors that impinged on the price rise and therefore those properties should have been excluded from the ‘results’ for that suburb.  Trouble is, you take those properties out, and the price FALL is dramatic.

Factors that made for selling prices being reported as UP from previous acquisition prices were as I’ve reported before in my blog.  Reconfiguring a home to cater for two families. Significant and costly renovations not taken into account. Rezoning of land adding to it’s base value.  And so on.  And… no IN and OUT costs taken into account to arrive at a nett gain (if any).

Make no mistake that fiscal policy makers are all out of ideas for getting our economy going.  The USA think-tank  has screwed up and nothing is working over there.  I know many people in the USA in business and they tell me it’s rubbish that side of the Pacific, more than a little scary and they’ve little to no confidence.

The USA 30 year mortgage rate when I was there in 2013, was about 3.4%.  A year later and its nudging 4.5%.  If the same rate of rise occurs here (and it will) our rates will jump 30%!  Imagine mortgage repayments for all those silly sods who dived in with their 90% plus loans on minimal deposit using their Mum n Dads place as extra collateral…  Most are paying over $500 a week – that could easily jump to $650 a week – and wipe out their ability to EAT!

An interest rate jump of that magnitude will cause a REAL and long overdue drop in house prices.

CHINA – for a start you can’t believe most of the numbers that come out of ‘Official’ China however the word from people I know who travel regularly to that mysterious land is that things are crap. I’ve heard it said that China is at about 2004/2005 on the Western GFC Clock.  When their house-of-cards comes down it will not be pretty and the flow on will be nasty.

Its all coming to  ahead.  If you have property, sell it NOW and take advantage of the pseudo reports and spin to get some sucker to cough up.  RENT, or take a long holiday.  And buy back in when the dust settles.  Go back in this blog to see just HOW CHEAP housing is in so many desirable areas of the USA – not the ghettos of Detroit but NICE PLACES TO LIVE.

We are waaay to expensive and need a correction… It’s coming…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MARKET UPDATE 15 NOVEMBER 2013

I’m seeing nothing that convinces me that anything has changed or turned around.  Whenever you see an article telling you differently, please read it all, to the end, where oft lies the truth or a disclaimer!

In my City the Council has foregone $35 million in developer fees to ‘kickstart’ new projects.  If a project can’t stand on its own with those ‘normal’ fees in place and has to rely on the local authority taking a haircut, then the project’s chances of failure are high. I’ll keep an eye on the list of projects that have miraculously ‘come on’ during this amnesty period to see how they fare.  A couple of phone calls and I discovered that many of the projects were going to go ahead anyway, and that the ‘discount’ on local government fees was just a bonus.  Government interference in free enterprise – it never works.

So everything is going UP is it?  Almost every real estate article you read says so so it must BE SO!  No.

Big sale of a site in Southport for 3 million dollars!  Wow!  Whoop-de-doo!  How about the poor schmuck who got his timing wrong when he paid 5 and a half million dollars for it at the very peak of the craziness in early 2007. Add to the obvious loss of 2.5 million dollars the holding costs over nearly 7 years and I wouldn’t be surprised if he watched double that go down the toilet.

Of course there’s always going to be the “odd” sale that surprises everyone. I know that.  But they are rare and there’s always some quirky reason why someone has apparently paid too much. I know of one in a capital city where everyone said the buyer was “nuts”.  But was he?  No-one at the time (not even local guru agents) knew that the blocks of land either side were already held by interests associated with him and that securing the third parcel made the whole piece of land so much more valuable as a height restriction went from 4 to 8 or 10 stories as a result.  Smart I’d say.

I lived at a fairly famous Resort on the northern end of the Gold Coast many years ago because I wanted to try the lifestyle.  6 months was enough. I was ‘out of there’… In the early 1990’s vacant blocks of land (non-waterfront) were changing hands for $500,000.00 and all the “wannabes” lapped it up.  It was fine marketing spin at its very best.  So exclusive and so magnificent was the Resort that today, more than 20 years later, dry blocks are selling for….wait for it…..$500,000.00… Oh dear.

Last but not least – commercial. Tenants renegotiating rents down 50% or more and basically holding landlords to ransom is the business of the day.  My local newspaper is full of “Mortgagee In Possession”, “Liquidator”, “Owner wants out”, “Overseas investor quits holdings” and other negative headlined commercial property for sale. These local agents are so duplicitous it makes me sick.  One one page they talk up the market like its the 2004 rocket sled, and yet at the back of the paper they try and suck you into a BARGAIN as a bunch of poor sods are forced to offload their property as drastically discounted prices.

I rest my case and step off my soapbox for this week.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MARKET UPDATE – 06 SEPTEMBER 2013

Sat a while today going through the newspapers. Still a lot of Mortgagee In Possession Sales, Receiver Sales and property for sale that I KNOW are in the hands of the Banks but the Agent has been told NOT to advertise it as such!  Mmmm – trying to hide something are we?  Yes you are!

I’m not going to rabbit on today except to say – look at the next photo, taken from a major newspaper today.  Says it all doesn’t it?

OUCH

OUCH

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: