Tag Archives: loss

Stats!

I’m  always intrigued, bemused and at times frustrated when I see ‘statistics’ so badly mauled in the Press.

Example. If you had $100,000 and got about 3% interest per year, compounded, your account would have a balance of around $116,000  after 5 years. Im assuming no tax, just to be clear.

Congratulations though, because your $100,000 has been eroded even faster by inflation.

When online and print articles proclaim that a 14.2% rise in the Median house price in Brisbane is a winner what on Earth are they banging on about?

14.2% compound over 5 years is a LOSS!

And the median is across all of Brisbane and can be so easily skewed by the odd high value sale. See previous parts of my blog for more detail on the ‘nil value of misquoted medians’.

Here on the Gold Coast, many Apartments, especially in the ‘basket case’ that is Southport, have dropped more than 20% in the last 12 months!

For the entire Gold Coast, sales volumes of Apartments fell through the floor,  dropping 10% in the 3 months to 31 December 2015. Just watch 2016! And see for yourself how poorly that sector will perform when March quarter figures are released. Year on year fall will be closer to 50%.

More soon.

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PRESSURE FROM ALL SIDES

Hi.  As we approach Christmas there are slightly alarming FACTS emerging around the country that point to a hefty correction around the corner for our teetering real estate market.

I guess the first one should be the USA’s impending decision to start to raise interest rates as they see their economy “recovering” somewhat.  The rest is happening here Down Under.  If we have a 2 percent rise in interest rates here, 40 percent of home owners will no longer be able to pay their mortgages – period – FACT.  That many properties flooding the market will start an avalanche of sales that I won’t be joining in to buy any time soon.  Not until the  streets are running a metre deep in Mortgage Blood would I get back into property.

Aussie Banks have tightened their lending criteria.  So many (foolish) people buy OFF THE PLAN – Why?  They stake their place with a ten percent deposit.  Come near settlement time, the Bank , after re-valuing most of these places says “Sorry – we need 20% deposit or NO LOAN for the rest”.  With most of these properties selling for OVER $700,000.00 who has a lazy $70,000 lying around?  Almost none of them so 1.  The seller sues and buyer loses deposit and equity in other properties etc or 2.  Buyer just walks away and leaves $70,000 behind and fingers crossed the Developer does not sue them for failing to complete.  Has this happened?  Yes – many, many times, especially here on the (fake tan – false Gods) Gold Coast.

When the Fire Sales start, whole suburbs will be revalued and lenders will eventually be forced to re-evaluate their portfolios and admit that most of their loans are under water.  Who of these battlers can come up with extra money if demanded by the Bank – ahhh – about NONE – unless Mum and Dad come to the rescue and put the family home up for security – in a falling market, this is a really DUMB IDEA!  But they will do it and the Banks will accept it – until the market corrects some more, and they ask for more equity and so on…until both properties are at risk of default.  Combine this scenario with the aforementioned rate rise “elephant in the room” and once again you can see why I am nowhere near real estate right now.

Things are getting tighter and tighter too – just look at the continued growth in credit card debt – bad enough at 18 to 22 percent per annum, but what about Pay Day lenders, who are raking it in – double the number of loans in the last year or so (average size about $500.00 I believe), with punters paying interest of over 100% per annum annualised!  If that does not point to a lot of people “losing the plot” financially, I don;t know what does.

Combine that Genius Financial IQ with previously mentioned factors and we have a recipe for disaster.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MORE COMMENTARY ON HOW OVERHEATED OUR HOUSING MARKET IS

It’s not front page news but it’s news nonetheless.  Increasingly, major Banks and Government business units are becoming more wary of the overheated state of the Australian housing market.  There was also scathing reports about the New Zealand housing market published recently by “people in the know” so we are not alone.

Barclays are not happy saying that our house prices are currently overvalued by 12 percent.  Well, that’s not to scary one would imagine.  On the surface, no, but read further into that – take a peek at my previous posts.  If a “correction” were to start, it would not just “stop at 12%” and say “there ya go – all corrected – lets move on – happy days”.  Corrections such as the one I say “must happen” will be much worse than just the 12% Barclay’s economists say.

Once it gets going it will be a mudslide and will over correct, as all markets do, so, 20% is not unreasonable and nor, for that matter, given the parlous state of a lot of mortgages today, 25%.

Your $600,000.00 family home becomes $450,000.00 and that $150,000.00 that you were going to draw out and live on, or travel on, or party on before you die, is GONE!

I keep saying to people who own debt free, substantial homes – sell it now and buy it back in 2 or 3 years for a big discount…  In the meantime, rent yourself a luxurious place and enjoy the trappings that your current home perhaps doesn’t have.  I know this strategy won’t suit everyone, but  people who have $1.5m tied up in the family home and take a 25% hit, maybe 30%, is a really nasty thing to contemplate.  The correction will also take away your ability to use your home for collateral at the level it is now – so “sell-take the cash – rent – and come back when things cool off”.

It’s not just me saying it…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EVEN MOODY’S IS AGREEING WITH ME NOW!

13 May 2015 in Sydney –

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

EVEN GIANT BOND MANAGER PIMCO HAS A VIEW LIKE MINE NOW

Please take a look at this article –  http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/pimco-calls-on-banks-to-do-their-bit-and-raise-capital-20150428-1mv1ly.html

I rest my case – AGAIN!

If you’re a property owner – get out NOW, put your money away, rent and wait til the bubble burst-eth!

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Australia is in one of the worst housing bubbles we have ever seen

So says author and commentator Lindsay David – I reproduce his article from the Domain website of 27 March 2015 and I acknowledge them and David in full for this article – could not have said it better myself!

By all accounts, Australia is experiencing what is one of the greatest credit-fuelled real estate bubbles in modern times. On the back of a collapsing mining sector, we can thank the RBA, APRA, ASIC and the political elite in Canberra for creating a flawed household wealth-creation strategy that shares all the hallmarks of a predictable economic disaster.

In plain English, since the mid-1990s, Australia’s strategy is for home buyers and investors to borrow heavily from lenders and flip houses to the next buyer who has taken out even more debt to speculate.

Today, all this country has to show for it is a $1.9 trillion mountain of household debt that will make the US credit-fuelled housing bubble of the last decade look like a walk in the park when our housing bubble bursts.

The unfortunate victims of today’s “wealth-creation” strategy are young home buyers and middle-income earners who are either completely priced out of the market or leveraged through the roof.

While our society lacks a meaningful and open debate on the toxic and rising levels of household debt, new home buyers in Sydney and Melbourne are entering the market and taking upon the most illogical sums of debt, courtesy of our over-leveraged banking system.

Based on median multiples, new home buyers in Sydney will spend the better part of 6.54 years savings (using 30 per cent of their income) for a 20 per cent deposit to buy a median-priced home.

When it comes to servicing the first 12 months of a 25-year/80 per cent LVR mortgage, it will cost roughly 65 per cent to 70 per cent of household income to service that debt at current record-low mortgage rates. Melbourne is not too far behind.

So what have our leading economists, regulators, public executives and politicians done to stop this debt-induced folly? Nothing. In fact, they have bent over backwards to inflate prices via stimulants such as housing grants and allowing retirees to tap into their life savings.

These powerful stimulants have been implemented, not to improve home ownership rates, but to boost prices for the benefit of existing owners, bankers’ profits and government balance sheets.

If new home buyers cannot access (or are not willing to take on) a greater sum of debt compared to previous buyers, Australia’s wealth-creation strategy will collapse just like it did in Ireland. Rest assured, our society is definitely caught up in the same irrational exuberance they experienced.

From 1996 to 2014, housing prices and mortgage debt significantly outpaced economic fundamentals like inflation, rents, incomes and GDP. Yet, our central bankers are more concerned about whether we will pay less tomorrow for a can of soda than new home buyers in Sydney borrowing $50,000 more than last year to buy a home. Where is the logic in that?

If the RBA factored in the expansion of debt required for a new home buyer to enter the market, inflation would officially skyrocket through the roof. Regardless, our political and economic elites are now stuck between a rock and a hard place.

Unfortunately, that is the price a country pays when it builds an unsustainable property bubble while avoiding a debate on the most important topic when it comes to housing: debt.

With Australia having the world’s most indebted household sector, the seemingly unending price rises in Fool’s Paradise will eventually slam to a halt.  As I argue in my new book Print: The Central Bankers Bubble, having the largest housing bubble and mining boom in Australia’s economic history going down simultaneously will cause a severe economic and social catastrophe.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

MAYBE IF I KEEP TALKING

Maybe if I keep talking about a major imbalance in the market that is, and has been for a long time, overdue for a correction to reality, people will start to listen.  I’m OUT of residential real estate, and have been for a few years now.  The downside risk is just too high.

And today, Thursday 26 March 2015, the Reserve Bank has issued a warning that cheap credit has and will continue to fuel a housing bubble.  Hello!!!

Just Google  RBA cheap credit housing bubble.  There are many links to the various articles in today’s news.

Once again, I rest my case.

 

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SYDNEY MORNING HERALD COMMENT – 13 FEB 2015

http://www.smh.com.au/business/rba-waves-red-flag-over-very-concerning-sydney-property-market-20150213-13eakh.html All you have to do is read what the Reserve Bank of Australia is now worried about.  Thanks to the Sydney Morning Herald for providing this story. I keep saying to all who will listen that this market is completely MAD, rising with no fundamental except for some perverse notion of “affordability” espoused by Lenders of all shades. Youngsters with massive mortgages, underpinned by guarantees and liens taken over their parent’s family home will pay the ultimate price when this House of Cards comes crashing down.  They do not realise that a 2 percent rise will mean their repayments will rise 50%, never mind the tens of thousands who currently enjoy interest-only honeymoon rate loans that will, over the next 12 to 18 months, revert to Principal and Interest at a rate significantly over market. I’m so glad I’m leasing right now, on the side lines and watching this unfold.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

‘Rich Dad’ author Robert Kiyosaki warns investors to avoid real estate in Australia

Yes, even Robert says this place is overheated and he is warning all who’ll listen to give our real estate market a wide berth.  The reasons he gives are sound, and echo my sentiments expressed over the last few years.

Kiyosaki said that foreign investment was spiking domestic prices and forcing local buyers to pay well above the true market price.

“Foreign investors are queuing up to buy anything they can get their hands on. This is causing average Australian punters to think they need to start buying now. It has created a bubble,” Kiyosaki told Fairfax Media.

Again – do not go there.  Its just ridiculous and whilst commentators here are saying its all good, there are still people near where I live suffering huge capital losses on sale.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

YET ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE THAT ITS ALL GOING PEAR-SHAPED

Housing leverage hits a record high  an article by Article by RP Data senior research analyst,
Cameron Kusher

 

Based on data from the Reserve Bank, the ratio of household debt to disposable income and housing debt to disposable income has increased over the June 2014 quarter with housing debt now at a record high level.

Each quarter, after the Australian Bureau of Statistics releases its data on financial accounts, the Reserve Bank (RBA) releases their ‘Household finances – selected ratios’ data sheet. The information provides a timely overview about the level of household leverage.

The latest data for June 2014 has just been released and it showed that at the end of the June quarter, total household debt to disposable income had increased to 151.1%. The figure had increased from 150.2% the previous quarter and 147.7% a year earlier. The ratio is now at it’s highest level since March 2008. As the first chart shows the ratio has been relatively flat over recent years but is now starting to rise once more.

 

Based on data from the Reserve Bank, the ratio of household debt to disposable income and housing debt to disposable income has increased over the June 2014 quarter with housing debt now at a record high level.

Each quarter, after the Australian Bureau of Statistics releases its data on financial accounts, the Reserve Bank (RBA) releases their ‘Household finances – selected ratios’ data sheet. The information provides a timely overview about the level of household leverage.

The latest data for June 2014 has just been released and it showed that at the end of the June quarter, total household debt to disposable income had increased to 151.1%. The figure had increased from 150.2% the previous quarter and 147.7% a year earlier. The ratio is now at it’s highest level since March 2008. As the first chart shows the ratio has been relatively flat over recent years but is now starting to rise once more.

 

When you look at the key driver of the increase in the ratio, it is no real surprise that leverage in the housing market is the major driver. As at June 2014, 137.1% of the 151.1% total household debt figure or a record high 90.7% was housing debt. In fact the 137.1% ratio of housing debt to disposable income is a record high and up from 136.1% the previous quarter and 133.3% a year earlier. As was the case with household debt, you can see that housing debt was relatively unchanged for a number of years but has recently started to rise once again.

 

The RBA breaks this data out further to owner occupiers and investors. Of that 137.1%, 90.9% (or 66.3% of the 137.1%) was to owner occupiers with the remaining 46.2% (or 33.7% of the 137.1%) to investors. The proportion of overall housing debt to owner occupiers is trending lower at the moment while investor debt rises.

The data also includes information on the value of assets to disposable income. According to the statistics, the ratio of total household assets to disposable incomes is 801.9%. This figure is now at its highest level since March 2008. This 801.9% is split into housing assets which account for 433.6% and financial assets which make up the remaining 342.2%. The housing assets figure is at its highest level since June 2008 while the financial assets figure is lower over the quarter, down from 342.9% in March.

 

The chart highlights the trends over time. What they indicate is that households have consistently stored a majority of their wealth in housing assets as opposed to financial assets. Unfortunately the data is not available prior to 1988 so we don’t have visibility on the results prior to that time.

Chart 4 looks at the annual change in the ratio of housing debt to disposable income plotted against the annual change in combined capital city home values. Although the ratio of housing debt to disposable income is rising it is doing so at a much more moderate pace than it has in the past despite quite strong growth in home values. It is difficult to know exactly why this is happening however, the RBA has reported in its latest Financial Stability Review that the typical mortgagee has more than 2 years’ worth of mortgage repayments sitting in mortgage offset or redraw facilities. This may go some way to explaining the moderate rise. Alternatively, a rise in foreign buyers could also be a contributing factor. Other potential reasons include lower loan to value ratios or investors purchasing using significant equity in their principal place of residence.

 

The data highlights that household and housing debt is increasing and with home values continuing to rise we would anticipate a further rise in both measures over the coming quarter. The RBA has previously stated that further increases in household debt are not ideal. With housing debt at a record high level and investor activity at near record highs, I don’t think it is any surprise that the RBA is looking to macroprudential tools to take some of the heat out of the housing market.

 

You don’t need the charts – the words tell it all.  Be very careful folks…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
%d bloggers like this: